Javascript required
Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Campaign Craft the Strategies Tactics and Art of Political Campaign Management 5th Edition

Attempt to influence the conclusion making process within a specific group

A political campaign is an organized attempt which seeks to influence the decision making progress within a specific grouping. In democracies, political campaigns frequently refer to balloter campaigns, by which representatives are chosen or referendums are decided. In modernistic politics, the most high-contour political campaigns are focused on general elections and candidates for caput of land or head of government, often a president or prime minister.

Campaign message [edit]

The message of the campaign contains the ideas that the candidate wants to share with the voters. Information technology is to get those who agree with their ideas to support them when running for a political position. The message often consists of several talking points about policy issues. The points summarize the chief ideas of the entrada and are repeated frequently in social club to create a lasting impression with the voters. In many elections, the opposition political party volition attempt to become the candidate "off message" by bringing up policy or personal questions that are non related to the talking points. Near campaigns prefer to keep the message broad in gild to attract the near potential voters. A bulletin that is too narrow can amerce voters or deadening the candidate downward with explaining details. For case, in the 2008 American presidential election John McCain originally used a message that focused on his patriotism and political experience: "Country Showtime"; later the message was changed to shift attention to his role as "The Original Maverick" within the political establishment. Barack Obama ran on a consistent, simple message of "change" throughout his campaign.

Campaign finance [edit]

Fundraising techniques include having the candidate call or run into with big donors, sending direct post pleas to small donors, and courting involvement groups who could end up spending millions on the race if it is significant to their interests.

Organization [edit]

In a modern political campaign, the entrada organization (or "auto") will have a coherent structure of personnel in the same way as any business of similar size.

Campaign managing director [edit]

Political consultants [edit]

Political consultants propose campaigns on nigh all of their activities, from research to field strategy. Consultants conduct candidate enquiry, voter enquiry, and opposition enquiry for their clients.

Activists [edit]

Activists are the "foot soldiers" loyal to the cause, the true believers who will carry the run by volunteer activists. Such volunteers and interns may accept role in activities such equally canvassing door-to-door and making phone calls on behalf of the campaigns.

Techniques [edit]

A campaign team (which may be as small as one inspired individual, or a heavily resourced group of professionals) must consider how to communicate the message of the entrada, recruit volunteers, and enhance coin. Campaign advertisement draws on techniques from commercial advert and propaganda, also entertainment and public relations, a mixture dubbed politainment. The avenues available to political campaigns when distributing their messages is limited by the police force, bachelor resources, and the imagination of the campaigns' participants. These techniques are often combined into a formal strategy known as the campaign plan. The plan takes business relationship of a campaign's goal, message, target audience, and resources available. The campaign will typically seek to identify supporters at the aforementioned fourth dimension as getting its message across. The modern, open up campaign method was pioneered by Aaron Burr during the American presidential ballot of 1800.[i] [2] [three]

Another modern campaign method by political scientist Joel Bradshaw points out four key propositions for developing a successful campaign strategy. "Showtime, in whatever election the electorate tin can exist divided into three groups: the candidate's base, the opponent's base, and the undecided. 2nd, by election results, data from registered voter lists, and survey research go far possible to determine which people fall into each of these iii groups. Tertiary, it is neither possible nor necessary to go the support of all people. Fourth, and last, once a campaign has identified how to win, it tin deed to create the circumstances to bring about this victory. In club to succeed, campaigns should straight campaign resources— money, time, and bulletin— to cardinal groups of potential voters and nowhere else."[4]

Entrada communication [edit]

Ballot entrada communication refers to party-controlled advice, e.one thousand. campaign advertising, and political party-uncontrolled advice, e.grand. media coverage of elections.

Campaign advertising [edit]

Campaign advertising is the use of paid media (newspapers, radio, idiot box, etc.) to influence the decisions made for and by groups. These ads are designed by political consultants and the campaign'due south staff.

Media direction [edit]

Media management refers to the ability of a political entrada to command the bulletin that information technology broadcasts to the public. The forms of media used in political campaigns tin exist classified into two distinct categories: "paid media" or "earned media".[v]

Paid media refers to whatever media attending that is directly generated from spending.[half-dozen] This form of media is unremarkably establish through political advertisements and organized events. An advantage of paid media is that it allows political campaigns to tailor the messages they show the public and control when the public sees them. Campaigns oftentimes prioritize spending in contested regions and increase their paid media expenses every bit an election approaches.[vii] Electoral campaigns often conclude with a "closing statement advertisement", an advertisement that summarizes the campaign'southward core themes and explains the candidate's vision for the future.[eight] In the 2020 election, Joe Biden's "Rise" ad starts with him maxim "nosotros're in a battle for the soul of this nation" and a worker in Donald Trump's Pennsylvania advertizement stated "that will be the end of my chore and thousands of others" if Trump lost.[9]

Earned media describes free media coverage, oft from news stories or social media posts.[10] Different paid media, earned media does not incur an expense to the campaign. Earned media does non imply that the political campaign is mentioned in a positive style. Political campaigns may oftentimes receive earned media from gaffes or scandals. In the 2016 United States Presidential Election, a majority of the media coverage surrounding Hillary Clinton was focused on her scandals, with the almost prevalent topics being topics related to her emails.[11]

Experts say that constructive media management is an essential component of a successful political campaign. Studies bear witness that candidates with higher media attention tend to take greater success in elections.[12] It is too important to note that each grade of media can influence the other. Paid media may raise the newsworthiness of an outcome which could lead to an increase in earned media.[13] Campaigns may also spend money to emphasize stories circulating through media networks. Inquiry suggests that neither form of media is inherently superior. A 2009 study establish that media coverage was not significantly more effective than paid advertisements.[14]

Demonstrations [edit]

Modern engineering and the internet [edit]

The net is at present a core element of modern political campaigns. Communication technologies such as e-mail, websites, and podcasts for various forms of activism enable faster communications past citizen movements and deliver a message to a large audience. These Cyberspace technologies are used for cause-related fundraising, lobbying, volunteering, community building, and organizing. Individual political candidates are too using the internet to promote their election campaign. In a study of Norwegian election campaigns, politicians reported they used social media for marketing and for dialogue with voters. Facebook was the primary platform for marketing and Twitter was used for more continuous dialogue.[fifteen]

Signifying the importance of internet political candidature, Barack Obama'due south presidential campaign relied heavily on social media, Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) and new media channels to engage voters, recruit campaign volunteers, and enhance entrada funds. The entrada brought the spotlight on the importance of using internet in new-age political candidature past utilizing various forms of social media and new media (including Facebook, YouTube and a custom generated social engine) to reach new target populations. The campaign's social website, my.BarackObama.com, utilized a low price and efficient method of mobilizing voters and increasing participation among diverse voter populations.[xvi] This new media was incredibly successful at reaching the younger population while helping all populations organize and promote activeness.

Now Online Ballot campaign has got a new dimension, the campaign information can be shared as in Rich Info format through campaign landing pages, integrating Google's rich snippets, structured data,[17] Social media open graphs, and husting support file formats for YouTube like .sbv (SubRip), .srt (subtitle resource track), .vtt (Video text trace), high proficiency and constructive algorithmic integration will be the core factor in the frame-work. This technology integration helps campaign information to reach a wide audience in dissever seconds. This has successfully been tested and implemented in 2015 Aruvikkara Election, 2020 Kerala Panchayat Election. Marcus Giavanni, social media consultant and blockchain developer and 2nd place opponent in the 2015 election, was first to file for the 2019 election.[xviii] Marcus Giavanni Uses Advanced Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, and Voice Indexing Predictions to box in campaigns.[19]

Husting [edit]

A husting, or the hustings, was originally a physical platform from which representatives presented their views or cast votes before a parliamentary or other ballot body. By metonymy, the term may now refer to whatsoever outcome, such equally debates or speeches, during an election campaign where one or more of the representative candidates are present.

Other techniques [edit]

  • Writing direct to members of the public (either via a professional person marketing house or, peculiarly on a small calibration, by volunteers)
  • Past distributing leaflets or selling newspapers
  • Through websites, online communities, and solicited or unsolicited bulk e-mail[20]
  • Through a new technique known as microtargeting that helps place and target small demographic slices of voters
  • Through a whistlestop tour - a series of brief appearances in several small towns
  • Hampering the power of political competitors to campaign, by such techniques as counter-rallies, picketing of rival parties' meetings, or overwhelming rival candidates' offices with mischievous phone calls (most political parties in representative democracies publicly distance themselves from such disruptive and morale-affecting tactics, with the exception of those parties cocky-identifying as activist
  • Organizing political firm parties
  • Using endorsements of other celebrated party members to heave support (see coattail issue)
  • Using a campaign surrogate - a glory or person of influence, candidature on a candidate'south behalf.
  • Remaining close to or at dwelling to brand speeches to supporters who come to visit as part of a front porch campaign
  • Vote-by-mail service, previously known as "absentee ballots" have grown significantly in importance every bit an ballot tool. Campaigns in most states must have a strategy in identify to impact early on voting[21]
  • Sale of official entrada merchandise (colloquially known every bit swag, in reference to the baiting technique) as a way of commuting a competitor's popularity into campaign donations, volunteer recruitment, and free advertisement[22]

Campaign types [edit]

Informational entrada [edit]

An advisory campaign is a political entrada designed to raise public sensation and support for the positions of a candidate (or her/his party).[23] It is more intense than a newspaper campaign, which consists of little more than filing the necessary papers to become on the ballot, merely is less intense than a competitive campaign, which aims to actually win election to the part. An informational entrada typically focuses on low-cost outreach such as news releases, getting interviewed in the newspaper, making a brochure for door to door distribution, organizing poll workers, etc.[24]

Newspaper campaign [edit]

A paper entrada is a political campaign in which the candidate only files the necessary paperwork to appear on the ballot.[25] [26] The purpose of such a token effort may be just to increase name awareness of a minor political political party, to give voters of a certain ideology an opportunity to vote accordingly, or to ensure that the political party has candidates in every constituency. It tin be a toll-effective ways of attracting media coverage. An informational campaign, by contrast, may involve news releases, newspaper interviews, door-to-door candidature, and organizing polls. As the level of seriousness rises, the marginal cost of reaching more people rises accordingly, due to the loftier cost of TV commercials, paid staff, etc. which are used by competitive campaigns.[27] Paper candidates do not wait to be elected and usually run simply as a way of helping the more than general campaign. However, an unexpected surge in back up for the party may result in many paper candidates beingness unexpectedly elected, as for example happened to the New Democratic Party in Quebec during the 2011 federal election.

Effects [edit]

A forthcoming study in the American Political Science Review found that campaigns have "an boilerplate effect of goose egg in general elections".[28] [29] The study institute two instances where campaigning was constructive: "First, when candidates accept unusually unpopular positions and campaigns invest unusually heavily in identifying persuadable voters. 2d, when campaigns contact voters long before election day and measure out effects immediately — although this early persuasion decays."[28] [29]

One reason why it is hard to judge the effectiveness of an election campaign is considering many people know who they want to vote for long before the campaigns are started. Voters are more likely to vote for a nominee based on whose values marshal closest with theirs. Studies propose that political party flips come up from the assay of how a voter sees their parties functioning in the years earlier a campaign fifty-fifty begins.[30]

Some other study suggests that at the 2017 Austrian legislative ballot, 31% of voters admitted to either developing of irresolute their party preferences during the election entrada. The study provides data that shows how the main parties within Austria had differing levels of voters flipping toward them, thus proving that an election entrada has some level of effectiveness that differs between parties, depending on factors such as media presence.[31]

Presidential campaigns [edit]

A big trunk of political science inquiry emphasizes how "fundamentals" – the state of the economy, whether the land is at war, how long the president's party has held the function, and which candidate is more than ideologically moderate – predict presidential election outcomes.[32] [33] [34] [35] [36] Yet, campaigns may be necessary to enlighten otherwise uninformed voters about the fundamentals, which thus become increasingly predictive of preferences as the campaign progresses.[32] [37] [38] [39] Research suggests that "the 2012 presidential campaigns increased turnout in highly targeted states by seven–eight percentage points, on average, indicating that modern campaigns can significantly alter the size and composition of the voting population".[twoscore]

National conventions [edit]

A consensus in the political science literature holds that national conventions commonly have a measurable effect on presidential elections that is relatively resistant to decay.[37] [38] [39]

Presidential and vice-presidential debates [edit]

Enquiry is mixed on the precise impact of debates.[37] [39] [41] Rather than encourage viewers to update their political views in accordance with the most persuasive arguments, viewers instead update their views to merely reverberate what their favored candidate is maxim.[42]

Presidential primaries [edit]

The fundamentals matter less in the outcome of presidential primaries. 1 prominent theory holds that the outcome of presidential primaries is largely determined by the preferences of political party elites.[43] Presidential primaries are therefore less predictive, as various types of events may impact elites' perception of the viability of candidates. Gaffes, debates and media narratives play a greater role in primaries than in presidential elections.[33] [44]

Strategies [edit]

Traditional ground campaigning and voter contacts remain the about effective strategies.[40] [45] Some research suggests that knocking on doors tin increase turnout by every bit much as 10%[46] and phone calls by as much every bit 4%.[47] One written report suggests that lawn signs increase vote share past 1.7 percentage points.[48] A review of more than 200 get-out-the-vote experiments finds that the almost effective tactics are personal: Door-to-door canvassing increases turnout by an average of virtually 2.v pct points; volunteer phone calls raise it by almost ane.9 points, compared to 1.0 points for calls from commercial telephone banks; automated phone messages are ineffective.[49] [fifty] Each field office that the Obama campaign opened in 2012 gave him approximately a 0.3% greater vote share.[51] The Obama 2008 campaign'south utilize of field nearly offices has been credited equally crucial in winning Indiana and North Carolina.[52] According to one report, the toll per vote by having a field office is $49.40.[52] Using out-of-state volunteers for canvassing is less constructive in increasing turnout than using local and trained volunteers.[53] [54]

Political scientific discipline research generally finds negative ad (which has increased over fourth dimension)[55] to be ineffective both at reducing the support and turnout for the opponent.[56] A 2021 study in the American Political Science Review found that television campaign ads do affect ballot outcomes, in particular in down-ballot races.[57] Co-ordinate to political scientists Stephen Ansolabehere and Shanto Iyengar, negative ads practise succeed at driving downwards overall turnout though.[58] A 2019 report of online political advertising conducted by a party in the 2016 Berlin state election entrada found that the online-ad entrada "increased the party'due south vote share by 0.seven percentage points" and that factual ads were more effective than emotional ads.[59]

According to political scientists Donald Light-green and Alan Gerber, it costs $31 to produce a vote going door to door, $91-$137 to produce a vote by sending out directly mailers, $47 per vote from leafletting, $58-$125 per vote from commercial phone banking, and $20-$35 per vote from voluntary telephone banking.[60] A 2018 written report in the American Economic Review found that door-to-door canvassing on behalf of the Francois Hollande campaign in the 2012 French presidential election "did non affect turnout, but increased Hollande's vote share in the first round and accounted for one fourth of his victory margin in the 2d. Visits' impact persisted in subsequently elections, suggesting a lasting persuasion effect."[61] According to a 2018 study, repeated get-out-the-vote phone calls had diminishing furnishings but each additional phone call increased the probability to vote past 0.vi-1.0 percent points.[62] Another 2018 study found that "party leaflets boost turnout by 4.3 percentage points while canvassing has a small additional outcome (0.6 per centum points)" in a United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland election.[63]

A 2016 study constitute that visits by candidate visits to states have modest effects: "visits are almost constructive in influencing press coverage at the national level and within battleground states. Visits' furnishings on voters themselves, yet, are much more than modest than consultants ofttimes claim, and visits announced to accept no effects outside the market that hosts a visit."[64] The authors of the study argue that it would be more effective for campaigns to get to the pockets of the land where wealthy donors are (for fundraising) and hold rallies in the populous states both to attract national printing and raise funds.[64] A 2005 study found that campaign visits had no statistically meaning result, afterward controlling for other factors, on voter turnout in the 1992, 1996, and 2000 elections.[65] On the other manus, a 2017 paper of the 1948 presidential ballot provides "potent evidence that candidate visits can influence electoral returns".[66] Other research too provides bear witness that campaign visits increase vote share.[67]

Co-ordinate to a 2020 report, campaign spending on messaging to voters affects voter back up for candidates.[68] Another 2020 report institute that political advertisement had small-scale effects regardless of context, message, sender, and receiver.[69]

History [edit]

Political campaigns accept existed as long equally in that location have been informed citizens to entrada among. Democratic societies have regular ballot campaigns, just political campaigning tin occur on particular issues fifty-fifty in non-democracies then long equally freedom of expression is immune. Often mass campaigns are started past the less privileged or anti-establishment viewpoints (as confronting more than powerful interests whose first resort is lobbying). The phenomenon of political campaigns are tightly tied to lobby groups and political parties.

The start modern entrada is often described as William Ewart Gladstone'south Midlothian campaign in 1878–80, although there may exist earlier recognizably modern examples from the 19th century. The 1896 William McKinley presidential campaign laid the groundwork for modern campaigns.[seventy] [71]

In the 1790-1820s, the Federalist Political party and the Democratic-Republican Party battled it out in the then-called "First Political party Arrangement". American ballot campaigns in the 19th century created the first mass-base of operations political parties and invented many of the techniques of mass candidature.[ commendation needed ]

History of election campaigns in America [edit]

Political campaigns are forever irresolute and evolving with the growth of technology. In the nineteenth-century candidates were not traveling the country in search of votes. That is until the American presidential race of 1896 when William McKinley recruited the help of Marcus A. Hanna. Hanna devised a plan to have voters come to McKinley. McKinley won the race with 51% of the votes.[72]

The evolution of new technologies has completely changed the way political campaigns are run. In the late twentieth-century campaigns shifted into television and radio broadcasts. The early 00s brought interactive websites. By 2008 the world of campaigns was available to millions of people through the internet and social media programs. 2008 marks a new era of digital elections because of the fast-paced motility of data.[73]

Encounter also [edit]

Techniques and traditions
  • Canvassing
  • Election litter
  • Ballot promise
  • Husting
  • Backyard sign
    • Sign state of war
  • Microtargeting
  • Permanent entrada
  • Political campaign staff
  • Research strategies of election entrada communication research
  • Robocalls & Personalized audio messaging
  • Votebank
  • Assumed Incumbency
General topics
  • Activism
  • Civics
  • Lobbying
  • Media manipulation
  • Minimal effects hypothesis
  • Portal:Politics

References [edit]

  1. ^ "The Election of 1800". Lehrman Institute.
  2. ^ Unger, Harlow Giles (2014). John Marshall: the Chief Justice Who Saved the Nation. Hachette Books. ISBN978-0306822216.
  3. ^ Wheelan, Joseph (2006). Jefferson's Vendetta: the Pursuit of Aaron Burr and the Judiciary. PublicAffairs. ISBN0786716894.
  4. ^ Sides, John (2018). Campaigns and elections : rules, reality, strategy, choice. Shaw, Daron R., 1966-, Grossmann, Matthew,, Lipsitz, Keena (Third ed.). New York. ISBN978-0-393-64053-3. OCLC 1027769548.
  5. ^ Wynne, Robert. "The Real Divergence Between PR And Advertising". Forbes . Retrieved 2021-09-27 .
  6. ^ "Definition of Paid Media - Gartner Marketing Glossary". Gartner . Retrieved 2021-09-27 .
  7. ^ Adgate, Brad. "The 2020 Elections Will Set up (Another) Advertizing Spending Tape". Forbes . Retrieved 2021-ten-04 .
  8. ^ "Closing statement (political campaigns)". Ballotpedia . Retrieved 2021-x-04 .
  9. ^ Gringlas, Sam (2020-10-27). "Biden And Trump Campaigns Stress Endmost Themes In New TV Ads". NPR . Retrieved 2021-x-04 .
  10. ^ Don, Stacks. A Professional person and Practitioner'due south Guide to Public Relations Research, Measurement, and Evaluation.
  11. ^ "Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election | Berkman Klein Centre". cyber.harvard.edu. 2019-12-17. Retrieved 2021-09-27 .
  12. ^ van Erkel, Patrick F. A.; Van Aelst, Peter; Thijssen, Peter (2020-04-01). "Does media attending lead to personal electoral success? Differences in long and short campaign media effects for top and ordinary political candidates". Acta Politica. 55 (ii): 156–174. doi:10.1057/s41269-018-0109-10. ISSN 1741-1416.
  13. ^ Rinallo, Diego; Basuroy, Suman (2009). "Does Advertisement Spending Influence Media Coverage of the Advertiser?". Journal of Marketing. 73 (6): 33–46. ISSN 0022-2429.
  14. ^ Don, Stacks (June 2009). "Exploring the Comparative Communications Effectiveness of Advertizement and Public Relations: A Replication and Extension of Prior Experiments". {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  15. ^ Enli, Sara Gunn; Skogerbø, Eli (2013). "Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics". Information, Communication & Society. 16 (five): 757. doi:ten.1080/1369118x.2013.782330. S2CID 143140185.
  16. ^ Lyons, Daniel (2008-11-22). "President 2.0". Newsweek . Retrieved 2010-05-11 . Obama harnessed the grass-roots power of the Web to become elected. How volition he use that ability now?
  17. ^ "Introduction to Structured Information - Search".
  18. ^ à´¡െà´¸്à´•്, à´µെà´¬് (2020-11-eighteen). "ആരും à´µോà´Ÿ്à´Ÿുà´šെà´¯്à´¤ുà´ªോà´•ും; à´¡ിà´œിà´±്റൽ à´ª്à´²ാà´±്à´±്à´«ോà´®ുà´•à´³ിൽ à´ª്à´°à´šാà´°à´£ം കളർഫുൾ | Madhyamam". world wide web.madhyamam.com . Retrieved 2021-02-23 .
  19. ^ "Several candidates accept filed to run for Denver mayor in 2019. Here'southward what they say". Denver Post. May 29, 2018. Retrieved October 2, 2018.
  20. ^ "Entrada Television receiver". Archived from the original on 2017-02-02. Retrieved 2020-05-08 .
  21. ^ Myers, Elise (2020-09-11). "What is one effective strategy used by political campaigns?". Campaigning Info . Retrieved 2021-04-12 .
  22. ^ Diane Tucker, Dawn Teo (3 November 2008). "Off The Charabanc: Obama Campaign Rewrites Fundraising Rules past Selling Trade". Huffington Post . Retrieved 20 May 2009.
  23. ^ "Publications - Social Research - Swinburne University - Melbourne" (PDF).
  24. ^ "Changing Focus/Priorities". Lppa.org. Archived from the original on July 25, 2008. Retrieved 2008-xi-08 .
  25. ^ "10 Questions With Libertarian Political party of Nevada Chairman Jim Duensing, Pt. 2".
  26. ^ "Media" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-10-nineteen. Retrieved 2015-04-02 .
  27. ^ Changing Focus/Priorities Archived July 25, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  28. ^ a b Kalla, Joshua; Broockman, David E. (2017-09-25). "The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in Full general Elections: Show from 49 Field Experiments". American Political Science Review. Rochester, NY. SSRN 3042867.
  29. ^ a b "A massive new study reviews the evidence on whether candidature works. The reply'due south dour". Vocalization . Retrieved 2017-ten-04 .
  30. ^ Campbell, James Due east. (2008-01-14). The American Campaign, Second Edition: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. Texas A&M Academy Press. ISBN978-1-58544-628-five.
  31. ^ Johann, David; Königslöw, Katharina Kleinen-von; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Thomas, Kathrin (2018-04-03). "Intra-Campaign Changes in Voting Preferences: The Touch on of Media and Party Communication". Political Communication. 35 (two): 261–286. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1339222. ISSN 1058-4609. PMC5894360. PMID 29695892.
  32. ^ a b Gelman, Andrew; King, Gary (2008-01-17). "Why are American Presidential Election Entrada Polls so Variable When Votes are so Predictable?". British Journal of Political Science. Rochester, NY: Social Scientific discipline Research Network. SSRN 1084120.
  33. ^ a b Noel, Hans (2010). "X Things Political Scientists Know that You Don't". The Forum. 8 (3). doi:x.2202/1540-8884.1393. S2CID 145700304.
  34. ^ Bartels, Larry K.; Zaller, John (2001-03-01). "Presidential Vote Models: A Recount". PS: Political Science & Politics. 34 (1): 9–20. CiteSeerX10.i.1.471.3300. doi:10.1017/S1049096501000026. ISSN 1537-5935. S2CID 154297918.
  35. ^ Jr, Douglas A. Hibbs (2000-07-01). "Bread and Peace Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections". Public Selection. 104 (i–ii): 149–180. doi:ten.1023/A:1005292312412. ISSN 0048-5829. S2CID 11065014.
  36. ^ Vavreck, Lynn (26 July 2009). Vavreck, 50.: The Bulletin Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. (eBook and Paperback). printing.princeton.edu. ISBN9780691139630 . Retrieved 2016-04-23 .
  37. ^ a b c The Timeline of Presidential Elections. University of Chicago Printing . Retrieved 2016-04-23 .
  38. ^ a b The Obama Victory. global.oup.com. Oxford Academy Press. 26 August 2010. ISBN978-0-19-539955-4 . Retrieved 2016-04-23 .
  39. ^ a b c Sides, John; Vavreck, Lynn (vii September 2014). Sides, J. and Vavreck, 50.: The Gamble: Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential Election. (Updated Edition) (eBook and Paperback). press.princeton.edu. ISBN9780691163635 . Retrieved 2016-04-23 .
  40. ^ a b Enos, Ryan D.; Fowler, Anthony (2016-05-01). "Aggregate Furnishings of Large-Scale Campaigns on Voter Turnout". Political Science Enquiry and Methods. FirstView (four): 733–751. doi:10.1017/psrm.2016.21. ISSN 2049-8489. S2CID 155467129.
  41. ^ Shaw, Daron R. (1999-05-01). "A Study of Presidential Campaign Consequence Effects from 1952 to 1992". The Periodical of Politics. 61 (2): 387–422. doi:10.2307/2647509. ISSN 1468-2508. JSTOR 2647509. S2CID 154687906. [ permanent dead link ]
  42. ^ Abramowitz, Alan I. (1978-01-01). "The Touch of a Presidential Contend on Voter Rationality". American Periodical of Political Science. 22 (iii): 680–690. doi:10.2307/2110467. JSTOR 2110467.
  43. ^ The Political party Decides. University of Chicago Printing . Retrieved 2016-04-23 .
  44. ^ "Why News Coverage of the Argue May Matter More than the Debate - The Monkey Muzzle". The Monkey Cage. ii Oct 2012. Retrieved 2016-04-23 .
  45. ^ Weinschenk, Aaron C. (2015-09-01). "Polls and Elections: Campaign Field Offices and Voter Mobilization in 2012". Presidential Studies Quarterly. 45 (3): 573–580. doi:x.1111/psq.12213. ISSN 1741-5705.
  46. ^ Gerber, Alan S.; Green, Donald P. (2000-01-01). "The Furnishings of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail service on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment". The American Political Science Review. 94 (3): 653–663. doi:10.2307/2585837. JSTOR 2585837. S2CID 59034723.
  47. ^ Nickerson, David W. (2007-04-01). "Quality Is Job One: Professional and Volunteer Voter Mobilization Calls". American Journal of Political Scientific discipline. 51 (2): 269–282. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00250.x. ISSN 1540-5907.
  48. ^ Greenish, Donald P.; Krasno, Jonathan Due south.; Coppock, Alexander; Farrer, Benjamin D.; Lenoir, Brandon; Zingher, Joshua Due north. (2016-03-01). "The effects of lawn signs on vote outcomes: Results from four randomized field experiments". Electoral Studies. 41: 143–150. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2015.12.002.
  49. ^ Green, Donald P.; McGrath, Mary C.; Aronow, Peter M. (2013-02-01). "Field Experiments and the Report of Voter Turnout". Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. 23 (1): 27–48. doi:10.1080/17457289.2012.728223. ISSN 1745-7289. S2CID 53376573.
  50. ^ Jacobson, Gary C. (2015-01-01). "How Do Campaigns Thing?". Annual Review of Political Scientific discipline. xviii (1): 31–47. doi:x.1146/annurev-polisci-072012-113556.
  51. ^ Masket, Seth; Sides, John; Vavreck, Lynn (2015-07-27). "The Ground Game in the 2012 Presidential Ballot". Political Communication. 33 (2): 169–187. doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1029657. ISSN 1058-4609. S2CID 146490882.
  52. ^ a b Darr, Joshua P.; Levendusky, Matthew S. (2014-05-01). "Relying on the Basis Game The Placement and Effect of Campaign Field Offices". American Politics Research. 42 (3): 529–548. doi:10.1177/1532673X13500520. ISSN 1532-673X. S2CID 154664815.
  53. ^ Sinclair, Betsy; McConnell, Margaret; Michelson, Melissa R. (2013-01-01). "Local Canvassing: The Efficacy of Grassroots Voter Mobilization". Political Communication. 30 (one): 42–57. doi:x.1080/10584609.2012.737413. ISSN 1058-4609. S2CID 42874299.
  54. ^ Middleton, Joel A.; Dark-green, Donald P. (March 2008). "Do community-based voter mobilization campaigns work even in battleground states? Evaluating the effectiveness of MoveOn's 2004 outreach campaign". Quarterly Journal of Political Science. three (one): 63–82. doi:10.1561/100.00007019. S2CID 52044755.
  55. ^ Dowling, Conor M.; Krupnikov, Yanna (2016-11-22). "The Effects of Negative Advertising". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.51. ISBN9780190228637.
  56. ^ Lau, Richard R.; Sigelman, Lee; Rovner, Ivy Brownish (2007-11-01). "The Furnishings of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment". Journal of Politics. 69 (iv): 1176–1209. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x. ISSN 1468-2508. S2CID 155001726.
  57. ^ Sides, John; Vavreck, Lynn; Warshaw, Christopher (2021). "The Effect of Goggle box Advertizement in United States Elections". American Political Science Review. doi:ten.1017/S000305542100112X. ISSN 0003-0554.
  58. ^ Ansolabehere, Stephen; Iyengar, Shanto (2016-06-20). Going Negative . The New York Times. Free Printing. ISBN9780684837116. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-06-xx .
  59. ^ Hager, Anselm (2019). "Do Online Ads Influence Vote Selection?". Political Communication. 36 (3): 376–393. doi:ten.1080/10584609.2018.1548529. S2CID 149800615.
  60. ^ "Every vote matters. What'south the all-time fashion to get them?". Public Radio International . Retrieved 2016-06-10 .
  61. ^ Vincent, Pons (2018). "Will a Five-Minute Give-and-take Change Your Listen? Countrywide Experiment on Voter Pick in France". American Economic Review. 108 (half dozen): 1322–1363. doi:10.1257/aer.20160524. ISSN 0002-8282.
  62. ^ "Repeated treatment in a GOTV field experiment: Distinguishing between intensive and all-encompassing margin effects".
  63. ^ Townsley, Joshua (north.d.). "Is it worth door-knocking? Evidence from a United Kingdom-based Get Out The Vote (GOTV) field experiment on the effect of party leaflets and canvass visits on voter turnout". Political Science Research and Methods: 1–15. doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.39. ISSN 2049-8470.
  64. ^ a b Wood, Thomas (2016-09-01). "What The Heck Are We Doing in Ottumwa, Anyway? Presidential Candidate Visits and Their Political Event". The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Scientific discipline. 667 (1): 110–125. doi:x.1177/0002716216661488. ISSN 0002-7162. S2CID 151905273.
  65. ^ Holbrook, Thomas K.; McClurg, Scott D. (2005-10-01). "The Mobilization of Cadre Supporters: Campaigns, Turnout, and Balloter Composition in United States Presidential Elections". American Periodical of Political Science. 49 (4): 689–703. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00149.x. ISSN 1540-5907.
  66. ^ Heersink, Boris; Peterson, Brenton D. (2017). "Truman defeats Dewey: The outcome of entrada visits on election outcomes". Electoral Studies. 49: 49–64. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2017.07.007.
  67. ^ Bednar, Steven (2017-07-28). "Campaigning and election outcomes in a presidential principal election". Applied Economic science Letters. 25 (10): 713–717. doi:10.1080/13504851.2017.1360999. ISSN 1350-4851. S2CID 158086367.
  68. ^ Schuster, Steven Sprick (2020-02-25). "Does Campaign Spending Affect Election Outcomes? New Evidence from Transaction-Level Disbursement Data". The Journal of Politics. 82 (four): 1502–1515. doi:10.1086/708646. ISSN 0022-3816. S2CID 214168948.
  69. ^ Coppock, Alexander; Loma, Seth J.; Vavreck, Lynn (2020-09-01). "The small furnishings of political advertising are small regardless of context, bulletin, sender, or receiver: Testify from 59 existent-time randomized experiments". Science Advances. 6 (36): eabc4046. Bibcode:2020SciA....6.4046.. doi:x.1126/sciadv.abc4046. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC7467695. PMID 32917601.
  70. ^ Wiesner-Hanks, Merry E.; Evans, Andrew D.; Wheeler, William Bruce; Ruff, Julius (2014). Discovering the Western By, Volume Two: Since 1500. Cengage Learning. p. 336. ISBN978-1111837174.
  71. ^ Price, Richard (1999). British Club 1680-1880: Dynamism, Containment and Modify. Cambridge University Press. p. 289. ISBN9780521657013.
  72. ^ Burton, Michael; Miller, William J.; Shea, Daniel M. (2015-06-23). Campaign Arts and crafts: The Strategies, Tactics, and Art of Political Entrada Management, fifth Edition: The Strategies, Tactics, and Art of Political Campaign Management. ABC-CLIO. ISBN978-1-4408-3733-3.
  73. ^ Owen, Diana (2017-08-24). Kenski, Kate; Jamieson, Kathleen Hall (eds.). "New Media and Political Campaigns". The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001. ISBN9780199793471 . Retrieved 2020-12-01 .

Sources [edit]

Earth [edit]

  • Abizadeh, Arash (2005). "Autonomous Elections without Campaigns? Normative Foundations of National Baha'i Elections". Globe Gild. 37 (1): 7–49.
  • Barnes, South. H., and M. Kaase Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Sage, 1979.
  • Blewett, Neal. The Peers, the Parties and the People: The General Elections of 1910. London: Macmillan, 1972.
  • Hix, South. The Political System of the Eu. St. Martin's Press, 1999.
  • Katz, Richard Due south., and Peter Mair (eds.), How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. Sage Publications, 1994.
  • Katz, Richard Due south.; Mair, Peter (1995). "Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Dare Political party". Party Politics. ane: 5–28. doi:10.1177/1354068895001001001. S2CID 143611762.
  • LaPalombara, Joseph and Myron Wiener (eds.), Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton Academy Printing, 1966.
  • Panebianco, A. Political Parties: System and Power. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  • Paquette, Laure. Campaign Strategy. New York: Nova, 2006.
  • Poguntke, Thomas, and Paul Webb, eds. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Written report of Modern Democracies. Oxford University Printing. 2005 online
  • Ware, Alan. Citizens, Parties and the State: A Reappraisal. Princeton University Press, 1987.
  • Webb, Paul, David Farrell, and Ian Holliday, Political Parties in Avant-garde Industrial Democracies. Oxford Academy Press, 2002

Us [edit]

  • Cycle, William Due south. Winning Political Campaigns: A Comprehensive Guide to Electoral Success. Chicago: Central Park Communications, 2012.
  • Cunningham, Sean P. Cowboy Conservatism: Texas and the Rising of the Mod Right. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2010.
  • Robert J. Dinkin. Campaigning in America: A History of Ballot Do. Westport: Greenwood, 1989.
  • John Gerring, Political party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  • Lewis L. Gould, Yard Old Party: A History of the Republicans. New York: Random House, 2003.
  • Gary C. Jacobson. The Politics of Congressional Elections. (5th Edition) New York: Longman, 2000.
  • Richard Jensen, The Winning of the Midwest: Social and Political Conflict, 1888–1896. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.
  • L. Sandy Meisel, ed. Political Parties and Elections in the U.s.a.: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland, 1991.
  • Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., ed. History of American Presidential Elections. four vols. New York: Chelsea Firm, 1971.
  • James A. Thurber, Campaigns and Elections American Style. New York: Westview Printing; 2nd edition, 2004.
  • Kirsten A. Foot and Steven One thousand. Schneider, "Spider web Candidature". The MIT Printing, 2006.
  • Bruce A. Bimber and Richard Davis, Campaigning Online: the Internet in U.S. Elections. Oxford Academy Press, 2003.
  • Justin A. Gravely. " Campaigning on American soil and the rules of the American Government". Cambridge Academy Press, 2014

Further reading [edit]

  • Gary C. Jacobson. 2015. How Do Campaigns Matter? The Annual Review of Political Scientific discipline.

External links [edit]

mccallacess1991.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_campaigner